Oral examination
Characteristics of better responses:
- a coherent and logical argument was maintained with clear articulation
- candidates elaborated with convincing and in-depth illustration within the time frame
- a wide variety of vocabulary and sentence structures were used
- a clear viewpoint was presented that was logically sequenced.
Characteristics of weaker responses:
- candidates could not maintain a cohesive and logical argument
- limited vocabulary and sentence structures were used
- incorrect pronunciation and intonation were used.
Written examination
Section I – Response to Prescribed Text
Characteristics of better responses:
- an in-depth analysis with relevant textual evidence was presented
- perceptive analyses of Lao Ye’s change of emotions (Q.1c) and Dafan’s feelings (Q.1d) were presented
- candidates expressed the integrity, sense of responsibility or discerning judgement of the council officer in response to the incident mentioned (Q.2)
Characteristics of weaker responses:
- Chinese language was copied from the text
- insufficient textual evidence was provided to support the answers
- not all aspects of the questions were addressed.
Section II – Writing in Chinese
Characteristics of better responses:
- a variety of vocabulary and language structures were used
- a sophisticated and comprehensive argument was presented with relevant support
- logical thinking and analytical skills were displayed in the development of an argument.
Characteristics of weaker responses:
- limited vocabulary and sentence structures were used
- certain aspects of the topics were focused on without elaboration
- responses were brief and superficial.
